Bad history exists to serve a demand
> Historians who cut sentences in half to prove their point don't even lose their Pulitzers.
Your linked post doesn't mention any Pulitzers. The book I assume you're referring to was a finalist for one award I'd heard of, and won another I hadn't:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_in_Chains#Accolades
I think you're right.
> Historians who cut sentences in half to prove their point don't even lose their Pulitzers.
Your linked post doesn't mention any Pulitzers. The book I assume you're referring to was a finalist for one award I'd heard of, and won another I hadn't:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_in_Chains#Accolades
I think you're right.